The following criteria and point system will be used to evaluate the base criteria for allocating club funding. Understanding each club has unique goals/objectives, these criteria serve as a baseline for evaluation and additional factors may or may not be considered in determining the final allocation amount. These criteria were developed to provide increased transparency and objectivity and to fairly allocate funds to student clubs.

General Evaluation (35 points possible)

  • 1 = poor
  • 2 = adequate
  • 3 = average
  • 4 = good
  • 5 = excellent
Points Timeliness of Request
1 pt:     Request submitted less than two weeks prior to event, program or travel.

 

3 pts:    Request submitted two weeks prior to event, program or travel.

5 pts:    Request submitted three or more weeks prior to event, program or travel

Points Past Funding/Frequency of Approved Requests
1 pt:     5 to 8 approved requests during the current academic year.

 

3 pts:    2 to 4 approved requests during the current academic year.

5 pts:    0 to 1 approved during the current academic year

Points Relevancy to Club Mission/Goals
1 pt:     Activity/event does not demonstrate a clear connection to club mission/goals.

 

3 pts:    Activity/event vaguely connects to club mission/goals but is missing details.

5 pts:    Activity/event clearly demonstrates a connection to club mission/goals detailing activities and NTC Success Skills.

Points Benefit to Students
1 pt:     Benefits only the individual student with no plan to share information (e.g. student is graduating).

 

3 pts:    Benefits the individual and the club with a demonstrated plan for how student will share the information with the club.

5 pts:    Benefits the individual, the club and the college by showcasing NTC in a positive light and/or collaborating with other clubs/departments.

Points Educational Relevance
1 pt:     Activity/event is for purely social purposes and is not clearly educational in nature.

 

3 pts:    Activity/event is primarily social in nature and demonstrates some clear educational value.

5 pts:    Activity/event is educational in nature and demonstrates a clear connection to NTC Success Skills.

Points Student/Club Support and Commitment
1 pt:     Club is relying solely on Student Life funding and there is no process in place to ensure participant attendance or commitment.

 

3 pts:    Club engages in basic fundraising but there is a limited process in place to ensure participant attendance or commitment.

5 pts:    Club has fundraised specifically for this activity/event and/or club members made a personal investment to ensure their participation.

Points Quality of Request
1 pt:     Club is relying solely on Student Life funding and there is no process in place to ensure participant attendance or commitment.

 

3 pts:    Club engages in basic fundraising but there is a limited process in place to ensure participant attendance or commitment.

5 pts:    Club has fundraised specifically for this activity/event and/or club members made a personal investment to ensure their participation.

Points General Evaluation Total Points
Subtotal 1

Bonus Points to Consider (4 points possible)

Points Participation in Student Life Events
2 pt: demonstrates support of Student Life events (include narrative outlining participation/support with funding request)
Points Collaboration with Other Clubs
2 pt: demonstrates collaboration with other clubs (include narrative outlining participation/support with funding request)
Points Bonus Total Points
Subtotal 2

Total Points + Scoring Rubric

To determine the percentage of funding, add together the General Evaluation and the Bonus Points. Then compare with the point totals and percentages below.

  • 35 or more = 100%
  • 31-34 = 90%
  • 28-30 = 80%
  • 25-27 = 70%
  • 22-24 = 60%
  • 19-21 = 50%
  • 16-18 = 40%
  • 13-15 = 30%
  • 10-12 = 20%
  • 7-9 = 10%
  • 4-6 = 5%
  • 3 or less = 0%